November 2011


On this Veterans Day, I thought I’d write about why I think ending homelessness for veterans is so important, and really is achievable.  I am not a veteran.  I don’t have any family members who were veterans.  And most of my friends aren’t veterans either.

And yet, I’m outraged that even a single veteran is homeless tonight, and I’d like our country to keep on the task of doing something about that.  We know a lot about homeless veterans – honestly we’ve probably spent more time studying the issue than we need to.  But let’s throw out the numbers, statistics, and data, and just get right down to some common sense – every veteran who is homeless today, whether they served in wartime or during a period of peace, has served the country.  And each one now needs the country to help them.  So let’s roll up our sleeves and get going.

It might surprise you to learn that we already are.  There are 75,000 homeless veterans today, down from more than 100,000 a few short years ago.  Unlike with other homeless populations, and even with recent wars resulting in more homeless veterans, veterans homelessness is going in the right direction.  We’re giving apartments to 10,000 veterans a year (sometimes including a veteran with a spouse and / or children), and housing thousands more with short term help until they get back on their feet – veterans are very resilient.  And happily, though we aren’t all the way there yet, fewer and fewer new veterans are becoming homeless as prevention efforts ramp up.

While government is stepping up to help homeless veterans, we could do more.  Apartments for 10,000 vets a year?  $75 million.  A drop in the bucket even in this time of concern over deficits.  Why not double that?  Or triple it.  It would probably mean one less missile for the Department of Defense.  But something tells me they’ve got extra.  And after all, they created much of the problem, by discharging a lot of soldiers without making sure they had a safe place to go and a stable path to long term success.  So I’ll enjoy my day off today, but Monday I’ll be right back to work making sure that on future Veteran’s Days I won’t have to walk past a veteran sleeping outdoors on my way to celebrate his service.

- Jeremy Rosen, Policy Director

On October 28, I had the opportunity to participate in a groundbreaking meeting between U.N. officials; leaders of NGOs; and members of the U.S. State Department, Department of Justice (DOJ), and HUD to discuss the criminalization of homelessness and poverty and its human rights implications, as well as strategies for opposing such policies.

The meeting, organized by the Law Center, was in response to a U.N. report documenting how criminalization practices in the U.S. and other countries violate internationally recognized human rights standards.  As the Program for Human Rights and the Global Economy fall fellow at the Law Center, I was thrilled to take part in such an important meeting.

The criminalization report, presented to the U.N. in October, was written by the top U.N. expert on extreme poverty and human rights, Magdalena Sepulveda. In her report, Ms. Sepulveda identified four major human rights violations:

 

  • Control of behavior of people in public spaces. For example, the criminalization of panhandling, eating, and sleeping.
  • Discriminatory urban planning and zoning regulations. For example, there is an increasing trend of moving homeless and poor people to the outskirts of cities.
  • Excessive and arbitrary restrictions on qualifying for public benefits. The U.S. has implemented a severe public benefits screening process, with the stated goal of avoiding fraud.
  • The use of detention in punishing homeless and poor people. The criminal justice system has a disproportionate effect on certain communities.

The purpose of the meeting was to address these concerns and brainstorm measures to combat the criminalization of homelessness, including recommendations from the rapporteur’s report.

As a newcomer to the field of human rights, the meeting gave me hope that international officials, federal government representatives, and NGOs can work collaboratively to combat human rights violations domestically. The diversity of voices in the room forced each participant to consider new perspectives on criminalization, and highlighted the distinct role each stakeholder can play in solving the problem. Discussed strategies included: increasing or decreasing HUD and DOJ funding to states and cities based on their treatment of homeless and low-income individuals; transferring foreclosed homes to community organizations, who could use them to house homeless and low-income individuals; reducing barriers to obtaining housing upon an individual’s release from prison; and the U.S. introducing a UN resolution declaring that the criminalization of homeless and poor people is contrary to human rights.

Simply discussing criminalization through a human rights prism was important; this meeting was an unprecedented interaction between U.S. officials, non-governmental representatives, and international experts and brought much-needed attention to domestic human rights issues.  The U.S. acknowledged that violations are occurring domestically and brainstormed ways to improve the situation.

The Law Center looks forward to continuing collaboration with the U.N., the federal government, and other NGOs in implementing strategies to eliminate criminalization policies and fight homelessness in the U.S. As my time at the Law Center draws to a close, I am encouraged that the U.S. is open to addressing its own human rights violations, and that the Law Center and other non-governmental organizations are insisting that the U.S. fulfill its obligations.  My experience at the Law Center has equipped me with invaluable strategies on advocating for domestic human rights that will surely be instrumental in my future social justice legal work.

- Julia Lum, Program for Human Rights and the Global Economy Fellow